12 - 4 in the opening games ... +£250 on bets. What a day !!
Therefore I spam you with my second link to the new blog of the sports gambling addict.
J'ai trop kiffé commentaires d'ailleurs, que je vais prendre en compte dès que les mtachs se calment un peu entre Lundi et Jeudi prochain.
Zeroooooooooooooooooooooo
nice article again dude - reading it has made me want to watch some bball this afternoon :)
RépondreSupprimerDay 2 was just as good with +£200 on willy !!!
RépondreSupprimerHot new article is online !!
Vegas baby Vegas !!
0
Zero du lundi de merde. Et pour ceux que ca tente. Drinks wednesday night! Place to be confirmed. Zero a tous.
RépondreSupprimermoi aussi je vous dis zéro.
RépondreSupprimerje vous signal aussi une zappance honteuse! j'ai pleins de commentaires en attente de réponse, et vous zappez.
and you don't leave a bro hanging!
Ce déluge de sport me laisse sans voix :)
RépondreSupprimerComme l'écrivait si justement Noam Chomsky :
Take, say, sports -- that's another crucial example of the indoctrination system, in my view. For one thing because it -- you know, it offers people something to pay attention to that's of no importance. That keeps them from worrying about -- keeps them from worrying about things that matter to their lives that they might have some idea of doing something about. And in fact it's striking to see the intelligence that's used by ordinary people in (discussions of) sports (as opposed to political and social issues). I mean, you listen to radio stations where people call in -- they have the most exotic information and understanding about all kind of arcane issues. And the press undoubtedly does a lot with this.
You know, I remember in high school, already I was pretty old. I suddenly asked myself at one point, why do I care if my high school team wins the football game? I mean, I don't know anybody on the team, you know? I mean, they have nothing to do with me, I mean, why I am cheering for my team? It doesn't mean any -- it doesn't make sense. But the point is, it does make sense: it's a way of building up irrational attitudes of submission to authority, and group cohesion behind leadership elements -- in fact, it's training in irrational jingoism. That's also a feature of competitive sports. I think if you look closely at these things, I think, typically, they do have functions, and that's why energy is devoted to supporting them and creating a basis for them and advertisers are willing to pay for them and so on.
Lis ce bouquin Déous si tu t'emmerdes. L'auteur construit un peu sur cette vision de Choamsky et surtout sur celle de Huxley dans Brave New Wolrd avant lui. C'est très éclairant et tu t'y retrouveras. Enfin on s'y retrouve tous finalement. Zéro
RépondreSupprimerIn short, if Orwell feared that what we hate (as in pain, war, authority, repression etc...) will ruin us, Huxley feared that what we love (as in entertainment and amusement) will ruin us. Well that book, to put it in the author's words, is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.
RépondreSupprimerBuen! Cimer pour le tuyau.
RépondreSupprimer